They can't believe how fast and stable Linux is

This may not be right. I play some games too, like CounterStrike 1.6 and Source on my old GF4 MX440, Mafia, Max Payne, etc., and I reinstalled formerly 2 times Windows 95 on my old 80486 and Windows XP one time due to virus infection. Without any pain and all was - and is - running as well, except for that 80486 (hard disk error, had bad sectors). Only one time I saw a BSOD under Windows XP on my machine and that was installing the old version of Nero Imagedrive.mystran wrote:Actually, I think there's just one class of users that's holding back the adoption of Linux as the standard operating system in homes: gamers.
I mean, it so happens that so called "gamers" are mostly stuck with Windows, since that's the platform most games run with the smallest amount of pain. And it so happens that so called "gamers" are also the same people that computer illiterate people tend to call when they need their computers fixed. I'm going to claim that this class of users known as "gamers" is at least as important group as all the business users, because the moment "gamers" don't want to touch Windows, most people's personal tech-support is gone.
I'm going to predict, that if it ever happens that a large number of "gamers" decides to switch away from Windows to something else, most of the "my internet is broken" users will switch after them.
The sad thing is, I switched to Windows myself a year or two back in part because I got myself addicted to a certain large online game, which happens to run not-nearly-as-well under Linux. After no longer playing, it didn't take too long for me to realize most of the other stuff I do I could do much better under a more user friendly operating system.
Hence back under Linux, this time using Ubuntu.
Code: Select all
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/M/MU d- s:- a--- C++++ UL P L++ E--- W+++ N+ w++ M- V+ PS+ Y+ PE- PGP t-- 5- X R- tv b DI-- D+ G e h! r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
I converted my parents to Linux, but I still do use Windows.Brynet-Inc wrote:What are these "games" you speak of?
I don't play games... I've played Doom and Quake in the past, But I don't see and purpose for games beyond wasting time.
I have noticed most of the "Windows" users not willing to switch away are "religiously" gamers.
I AGREE!mystran wrote:Actually, I think there's just one class of users that's holding back the adoption of Linux as the standard operating system in homes: gamers.
I mean, it so happens that so called "gamers" are mostly stuck with Windows, since that's the platform most games run with the smallest amount of pain. And it so happens that so called "gamers" are also the same people that computer illiterate people tend to call when they need their computers fixed. I'm going to claim that this class of users known as "gamers" is at least as important group as all the business users, because the moment "gamers" don't want to touch Windows, most people's personal tech-support is gone.
I'm going to predict, that if it ever happens that a large number of "gamers" decides to switch away from Windows to something else, most of the "my internet is broken" users will switch after them.
The sad thing is, I switched to Windows myself a year or two back in part because I got myself addicted to a certain large online game, which happens to run not-nearly-as-well under Linux. After no longer playing, it didn't take too long for me to realize most of the other stuff I do I could do much better under a more user friendly operating system.
Hence back under Linux, this time using Ubuntu.
what good are computers if not for playing games?Brynet-Inc wrote:What are these "games" you speak of?
I don't play games... I've played Doom and Quake in the past, But I don't see and purpose for games beyond wasting time.
I have noticed most of the "Windows" users not willing to switch away are "religiously" gamers.
You're joking right? I occupy my time with better things, more productive that's for sure.supagu wrote:what good are computers if not for playing games?Brynet-Inc wrote:What are these "games" you speak of?
I don't play games... I've played Doom and Quake in the past, But I don't see and purpose for games beyond wasting time.
I have noticed most of the "Windows" users not willing to switch away are "religiously" gamers.
no, i see it has uses in buisness and R&D, but for the home user extremely useless. what do you do with your computer at home (non programming related) thats constructive?Brynet-Inc wrote:You're joking right? I occupy my time with better things, more productive that's for sure.supagu wrote:what good are computers if not for playing games?Brynet-Inc wrote:What are these "games" you speak of?
I don't play games... I've played Doom and Quake in the past, But I don't see and purpose for games beyond wasting time.
I have noticed most of the "Windows" users not willing to switch away are "religiously" gamers.
I'll never comprehend that weird gaming addiction... It'll never be better then a good Science fiction book/movie.
Be sure to contact me though when geek code "C++++" becomes a possibility.
I do things programming relatedsupagu wrote:no, i see it has uses in buisness and R&D, but for the home user extremely useless. what do you do with your computer at home (non programming related) thats constructive?