jhawthorn wrote:
Both styles need to be employed. Though the first style looks great and is easy to edit when only a few lines of code are involved, many (or at least I) find the code slightly hard to read when there isn't enough of a border between it and other text.
Current code snippets are already contained in a box with a different background color, and the only real difference is that you added a header to it. (invitiation for criticism
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
)
Quote:
If not completely removed template:Code needs to be fixed. Eugh! Look at that thing! Blue on grey! I was actually waiting for some style to develop before fixing the template. Hopefully we can establish a solution in this thread.
Suggestion: Since the majority prefers wiki's built-in style (maybe due to familiarity), could you change the template to look like the built-in style, but with header?
Still, if you want you can advertise some alternative templates, maybe you'll be lucky and we like it
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Quote:
Both styles need to use templates. Is has already been noted that setting a certain style now would provide a lot of tedious work if a different style was desired in the future. Templates, however, would allow editing a single page (ATM template:Code) to change the style for the entire wiki. Templates also allow for other neat features.
If you provide a template:Snippet, i'm fine with it. I dont suppose chase wants to change the builtin wiki styles manually...