alexfru wrote:
I don't recall it documented this way (the NULL descriptor may contain anything). Is it really so?
Yes. Here's a quote from the AMD Manuals:
AMD Manual vol. 2 s. 4.5.1 wrote:
Null Selector. Null selectors have a selector index of 0 and TI=0, corresponding to the first entry in the GDT. However, null selectors do not reference the first GDT entry but are instead used to invalidate unused segment registers. A general-protection exception (#GP) occurs if a reference is made to use a segment register containing a null selector in non-64-bit mode. By initializing unused segment registers with null selectors software can trap references to unused segments.
Intel:
Intel Manual vol. 3A s. 3.4.2 wrote:
The first entry of the GDT is not used by the processor. A segment selector that points to this entry of the GDT (that is, a segment selector with an index of 0 and the TI flag set to 0) is used as a “null segment selector.” The processor does not generate an exception when a segment register (other than the CS or SS registers) is loaded with a null selector. It does, however, generate an exception when a segment register holding a null selector is used to access memory. A null selector can be used to initialize unused segment registers. Loading the CS or SS register with a null segment selector causes a general-protection exception (#GP) to be generated.