OSDev.org

The Place to Start for Operating System Developers
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 3:34 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Brooks's law
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:26 am
Posts: 1
Since you are guarding even the comment pages of your wiki like a national treasure
I put my comment here. Can you please remove the wrong statement on this page
http://wiki.osdev.org/Beginner_Mistakes

<quote>Brooks' Law states that the more people on a project, the longer it takes. </quote>

If you realy want to put Brookes's law in such simple terms I think you could state two things:
- The more people are working on a project the more the overhead increases.
- Adding developers to a late project will make it later.

The text of the wiki reads like "one programmer can do the same work faster then 10 programmers".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brooks's law
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 2:56 am 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:45 am
Posts: 9301
Location: On the balcony, where I can actually keep 1½m distance
Henry wrote:
Since you are guarding even the comment pages of your wiki like a national treasure
Says someone that hasn't even ever logged in to the wiki, let alone effect a change. Are you a troll?

_________________
"Certainly avoid yourself. He is a newbie and might not realize it. You'll hate his code deeply a few years down the road." - Sortie
[ My OS ] [ VDisk/SFS ]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brooks's law
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 3:11 am 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 3:41 am
Posts: 1761
Location: Hong Kong
Henry wrote:
1. the more people on a project, the longer it takes.
2. one programmer can do the same work faster then 10 programmers".


(1) does not imply (2), since:
- The work for (1) may, and in reality usually be, much more than (2) due to more contribution and opinions.
- You assume the work can be completed by one programmer.

Anyway, different people may get slightly different meaning over the same word, and it does not matter much as long as the core idea is the retained.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brooks's law
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 9:55 am 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:12 am
Posts: 923
Location: Finland
As an almost-ontopic note, I think that one good thing about having more than one developer in a project is that it makes it necessary to have proper interfaces/documentation/comments. In a small project one developer can remember all the "this procedure cannot run until this and this" etc.

In an ideal project, this is not a problem but...

_________________
Undefined behavior since 2012


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brooks's law
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 11:23 am 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:45 am
Posts: 9301
Location: On the balcony, where I can actually keep 1½m distance
Still, for the people that page was written for, two of them can't write a OS faster than one. Let alone write an OS, which makes the entire brooks' law thing moot anyway ; )

_________________
"Certainly avoid yourself. He is a newbie and might not realize it. You'll hate his code deeply a few years down the road." - Sortie
[ My OS ] [ VDisk/SFS ]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brooks's law
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:15 pm 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:36 pm
Posts: 2111
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Still, we shouldn't misquote. Brooks' law probably doesn't apply at all since hobby projects generally have quite a loose schedule.

I suspect the OP is a previously banned member who is annoyed at having some of his/her own wiki gibberish reverted. As for discussion pages, I've yet to see anything of the sort in the 5 years I've been a member.

_________________
"Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons.", Popular Mechanics (1949)
[ Project UDI ]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brooks's law
PostPosted: Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:05 pm 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:45 am
Posts: 9301
Location: On the balcony, where I can actually keep 1½m distance
Well, to be honest I don't see an actual quote. I only see a paraphrasing of the core principle that more project members means the amount of work will increase due to overhead. The way it is phrased adds the ambiguity whether this concerns wall time or effort time - and from personal experience (not OS related though) both may turn out to be very true.

Plus, the idiots that want to do commercial or especially educational OSdev tend to actually do have a schedule.

Anyway, I don't see an obvious improvement to make as being politically correct does not help the target audience. If you have ideas, feel free to edit it as that's what the wiki is for :wink:

_________________
"Certainly avoid yourself. He is a newbie and might not realize it. You'll hate his code deeply a few years down the road." - Sortie
[ My OS ] [ VDisk/SFS ]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brooks's law
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 10:34 am 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:55 am
Posts: 509
Combuster wrote:
Henry wrote:
Since you are guarding even the comment pages of your wiki like a national treasure
Says someone that hasn't even ever logged in to the wiki, let alone effect a change. Are you a troll?


I think by "guarding like a national treasure" he means "requiring a login to edit, rather than letting people edit anonymously like Wikipedia".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brooks's law
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:50 am 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:07 am
Posts: 374
Location: Wrocław/Racibórz, Poland
A login AND reading instructions!

Logging would probably be bearable for some people; but reading instructions?!

_________________
Reaver Project :: Repository :: Ohloh project page
<klange> This is a horror story about what happens when you need a hammer and all you have is the skulls of the damned.
<drake1> as long as the lock is read and modified by atomic operations


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brooks's law
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:07 pm 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 3:41 am
Posts: 1761
Location: Hong Kong
Login account is free, I think it's main purpose is to present a CC0-alike statement to contributors, but not about preventing anyone from editing, furthermore you can still do it anonymously by creating dummy login account.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brooks's law
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:52 pm 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:45 am
Posts: 9301
Location: On the balcony, where I can actually keep 1½m distance
bluemoon wrote:
Login account is free, I think it's main purpose is to present a CC0-alike statement to contributors
Simpler: No spambot has a combined mediawiki and phpbb engine. :wink:

_________________
"Certainly avoid yourself. He is a newbie and might not realize it. You'll hate his code deeply a few years down the road." - Sortie
[ My OS ] [ VDisk/SFS ]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Brooks's law
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 3:10 pm 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 12:27 pm
Posts: 409
Combuster wrote:
bluemoon wrote:
Login account is free, I think it's main purpose is to present a CC0-alike statement to contributors
Simpler: No spambot has a combined mediawiki and phpbb engine. :wink:

It actually says this somewhere in the wiki.

_________________
Programming is 80% Math, 20% Grammar, and 10% Creativity <--- Do not make fun of my joke!
If you're new, check this out.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group