Page 2 of 2

Author:  JohnnyTheDon [ Sun May 17, 2009 7:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [SPLIT] New OS

There are 14 moderators. Since we can't have fragments of moderators, that means only one or two of these are of the 10%. You already named Jack and E. Do you seriously consider Combuster to have no "backbone"? Do you think Brendan isn't a "gentleman"?

In a good community, we shouldn't need moderators intervening all the time. They should edit/lock/ban only when necessary to keep order, and for the most part that is what happens. Would you rather have the mods go crazy and enforce martial law?

Author:  purage [ Sun May 17, 2009 8:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [SPLIT] New OS

It's obvious Combuster hurt his feelings by calling his name in a thread as an example of what not to do. He said, don't take any offense, but he did. So here we are arguing a moot point. Just lock the thread to keep the peace.

Author:  01000101 [ Sun May 17, 2009 8:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: [SPLIT] New OS

your wish is my command... (and I agree with you).

This thread is going no where helpful, it's best we leave it at this. Dex, while I'm grateful for the compliment, I'm not sure you should be calling all of the other mods spineless. They lock threads and try to keep the peace, if you have a direct complaint, please PM either the mod you have a complaint about or to another mod for review. Public accusations will only start flame wars, and I doubt (hope) that's what you want. :wink:

Page 2 of 2 All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group