Quote:
...the second and third were an act of preserving national freedom...
I put this as a result of strong country occupy another weak(army) country
and I think this is the law of forest,if you remember back in the beginning
of 2003,most of the peopel around the world made hundreds of manifestation
against the war on Iraq even in USA itself,so the war wasn't because America
wanted neithr to preserve national freedom,nor making the world more safe,
the old Iraqin government had nothing to do with neither 9/11 nor it threatend America(as Solar said)
back in 1980s the same government was govern Iraq,America did support it and gave it
weapons to fight Iran.
Also America said before the war that Iraq has nuclear weapons,and this is a serious threat
for all the countries around the world,and after US army entered to Iraq, it turns out that
this is all was lying to justify the war which I think the main goal of it was to control
the sources of oil in the middle east.
what do you guys think about the real goal of the war?
Also do you think national freedom means taking freedom from small countries???
and occupying them against there well,don't you remember aboghareeb prison
and the abuse that happened there,I live in a country next to Iraq
and in my building there is two Iraqian Immigrants families,who told me
that aboghareeb wasn't neither the only case nor the last,and there is alot of secret
prisons around Iraq where the abuse happening all the time.
and I don't think this is the concept democracy
@lollynoob:you don't worth replying.