OSDev Wiki Relicensing statements

Question about which tools to use, bugs, the best way to implement a function, etc should go here. Don't forget to see if your question is answered in the wiki first! When in doubt post here.
Locked
User avatar
Combuster
Member
Member
Posts: 9301
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:45 am
Freenode IRC: [com]buster
Location: On the balcony, where I can actually keep 1½m distance
Contact:
Contact Combuster

Re: OSDev Wiki Relicensing statements

Post by Combuster »

The only person who was allowed to copy your tutorial to the wiki is yourself, so that shouldn't be a problem.
"Certainly avoid yourself. He is a newbie and might not realize it. You'll hate his code deeply a few years down the road." - Sortie
[ My OS ] [ VDisk/SFS ]
Top
jal
Member
Member
Posts: 1385
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 9:09 am

Re: OSDev Wiki Relicensing statements

Post by jal »

For officialities sake:

I have taken notice of the CC0 license and its intended effects, and hereby declare that all my past and future contributions to the OSDev.org Wiki are licensed under the effect of the CC0.

Although I'm not sure that it is actually the case that you retain copyright on anything you write, regardless of the where and when.


JAL
Top
Craze Frog
Member
Member
Posts: 368
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:52 am

Re: OSDev Wiki Relicensing statements

Post by Craze Frog »

The CC0 license is silly because you waive copyrights. This means someone else could claim the copyright and then sue the original author for copyright infringement...

I have taken notice of the CC0 license and its intended effects, and hereby declare that all my past and future contributions to the OSDev.org Wiki are licensed under the effect of the CC0.
Top
User avatar
Owen
Member
Member
Posts: 1700
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:21 pm
Location: Cambridge, United Kingdom
Contact:
Contact Owen

Re: OSDev Wiki Relicensing statements

Post by Owen »

Craze Frog wrote:The CC0 license is silly because you waive copyrights. This means someone else could claim the copyright and then sue the original author for copyright infringement...


No it doesn't...
Top
charlemagne
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:57 am

Re: OSDev Wiki Relicensing statements

Post by charlemagne »

I have taken notice of the CC0 license and its intended effects, and hereby declare that all my past and future contributions to the OSDev.org Wiki are licensed under the effect of the CC0.
Top
User avatar
Chandra
Member
Member
Posts: 487
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 12:45 am

Re: OSDev Wiki Relicensing statements

Post by Chandra »

I hereby, agree to impose the CC0 license to all my contributions to the OSDev Wiki, as long as the CC0 license remains legal and valid.
Programming is not about using a language to solve a problem, it's about using logic to find a solution !
Top
lithium26
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 4:38 am

Re: OSDev Wiki Relicensing statements

Post by lithium26 »

I have taken notice of the CC0 license and its intended effects, and hereby declare that all my past and future contributions to the OSDev.org Wiki are licensed under the effect of the CC0.

(Am I infringing copyright by copy-pasting this statement?)
Top
matik
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:52 am

Re: OSDev Wiki Relicensing statements

Post by matik »

I have taken notice of the CC0 license and its intended effects, and hereby declare that all my past and future contributions to the OSDev.org Wiki are licensed under the effect of the CC0.
Top
User avatar
Lithorien
Member
Member
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 1:40 pm
Location: Hanover, PA
Contact:
Contact Lithorien

Re: OSDev Wiki Relicensing statements

Post by Lithorien »

I hereby declare that I have taken notice of the CC0 license and its intended effects, and hereby declare that all my contributions to the OSDev.org Wiki and its predecessor the MegaTokyo FAQ are licensed under the effect of the CC0.



Sorry about forgetting, and thank you Combuster for the reminder. :)
Top
MaD70
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:30 am
Location: Italy

Re: OSDev Wiki Relicensing statements

Post by MaD70 »

I have taken notice of the CC0 license and its intended effects, and hereby declare that all my contributions to the OSDev.org Wiki and its predecessor the MegaTokyo FAQ are licensed under the effect of the CC0.

P.S.: I don't even remember what information I contributed (too back in the past) but anyway PD is ok for me.
Top
User avatar
MDM
Member
Member
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:05 pm

Re: OSDev Wiki Relicensing statements

Post by MDM »

I have taken notice of the CC0 license and its intended effects, and hereby declare that all my past and future contributions to the OSDev.org Wiki are licensed under the effect of the CC0.
Top
Martijn
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:43 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: OSDev Wiki Relicensing statements

Post by Martijn »

I have taken notice of the CC0 license and its intended effects, and hereby declare that all my past and future contributions to the OSDev.org Wiki are licensed under the effect of the CC0.
Top
garob
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 3:26 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: OSDev Wiki Relicensing statements

Post by garob »

I have taken notice of the CC0 license and its intended effects, and hereby declare that all my past and future contributions to the OSDev.org Wiki are licensed under the effect of the CC0.
Top
jrw
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:44 pm

Re: OSDev Wiki Relicensing statements

Post by jrw »

I have taken notice of the CC0 license and its intended effects, and hereby declare that all my past and future contributions to the OSDev.org Wiki are licensed under the effect of the CC0.
Top
User avatar
mystran
Member
Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:08 am

Re: OSDev Wiki Relicensing statements

Post by mystran »

Having been notified by PM that someone thinks this is important:

Yeah sure whatever. Anything I've ever written to the Wiki can be considered public domain. Hopefully this is sufficient?
The real problem with goto is not with the control transfer, but with environments. Properly tail-recursive closures get both right.
Top
Locked

Return to “OS Development”