Upgrading Forum Software

Questions, comments, and suggestions about this site should go here.
m712
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2017 4:57 pm
Libera.chat IRC: m712

Upgrading Forum Software

Post by m712 »

According to the copyright notice at the bottom, the current software on this forum is 10 years old. Can we upgrade this forum's software to a more recent version? I can help with migrations if necessary.
The most recent version of phpBB was published on http://phpbb.org/ and was released on 07 Jan 2017.
User avatar
dozniak
Member
Member
Posts: 723
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:29 am
Location: Tallinn, Estonia

Re: Upgrading Forum Software

Post by dozniak »

If you could persuade Chase to bother...
Learn to read.
User avatar
Js2xxx
Member
Member
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 1:43 am
Libera.chat IRC: wrgq
Location: China

Re: Upgrading Forum Software

Post by Js2xxx »

While I think ASP.NET 5 is better...???
Doing steadfastly, or doing nil.
User avatar
Schol-R-LEA
Member
Member
Posts: 1925
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:42 am
Location: Athens, GA, USA

Re: Upgrading Forum Software

Post by Schol-R-LEA »

This is the song that doesn't end...

Seriously, if we changed it, the first two posts on the new forum would be, "this software sucks, we should upgrade to x" and "bring back the old forum software", in no particular order and repeated five times a day for a month.

We would be more polite about it than, say, WTDWTF was, but then that applies to most things - as bitter as some of the discussions here can get, OSDev is an island of tranquility compared to most of webfora. Mind you, the fact that there were complaints on the board right after the switch to NodeBB, even as others were rejoicing at the overthrow of the much-hated Jeff Atwood and Discourse on the site, says a lot more about WTDWTF's community than about either Discourse or NodeBB.

I'm not saying we shouldn't upgrade to a new version of PHPbb, if only to swap the old bugs for exciting newer ones, etc., but it is by no means a priority.
Rev. First Speaker Schol-R-LEA;2 LCF ELF JAM POEE KoR KCO PPWMTF
Ordo OS Project
Lisp programmers tend to seem very odd to outsiders, just like anyone else who has had a religious experience they can't quite explain to others.
User avatar
Kazinsal
Member
Member
Posts: 559
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 7:38 pm
Libera.chat IRC: Kazinsal
Location: Vancouver
Contact:

Re: Upgrading Forum Software

Post by Kazinsal »

The only reason I would want the forum software to be upgraded would be to improve the strength of password hashes (eg. bcrypt or high-rounds PBKDF2) and force a password reset to ensure everyone's using the new hashing algorithm.

IIRC the version we're running is old enough to be on salted MD5, and that was frankly terrible in 2007, let alone 2017.
User avatar
matt11235
Member
Member
Posts: 286
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2016 1:52 pm
Location: East Riding of Yorkshire, UK

Re: Upgrading Forum Software

Post by matt11235 »

This version of phpBB has mostly the same features as the newer versions, so the main issue is security. If you go through Google there doesn't seem to be any public vulnerabilities that affect the site. It's a shame that the same can't be said about most other PHP code :mrgreen:

The only suggestion I have is switching to PHP 7 and enabling the opcode cache, I just did that for the CompilerDev forums and the speedups were quite significant.
com.sun.java.swing.plaf.nimbus.InternalFrameInternalFrameTitlePaneInternalFrameTitlePaneMaximizeButtonWindowNotFocusedState
Compiler Development Forum
onlyonemac
Member
Member
Posts: 1146
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 2:59 pm

Re: Upgrading Forum Software

Post by onlyonemac »

I agree, we should *probably* upgrade to a newer version of phpBB. (Not *certainly* because I don't know how easy it is to migrate existing posts and themes - I've seen other sites have difficulties migrating themes when they upgrade phpBB.)

We should not, however, change to different forum software. I've yet to see a website which has changed forum software without either messing up the formatting or layout of old posts or losing either their old posts and/or half their userbase. And there's no need to change forum software - phpBB may not be the most feature-packed but it has all the features that we need and it's nowhere near obsolete. My experience with most other forum software is that it's slow, overpowered, and difficult to use.
When you start writing an OS you do the minimum possible to get the x86 processor in a usable state, then you try to get as far away from it as possible.

Syntax checkup:
Wrong: OS's, IRQ's, zero'ing
Right: OSes, IRQs, zeroing
User avatar
SpyderTL
Member
Member
Posts: 1074
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 10:05 pm

Re: Upgrading Forum Software

Post by SpyderTL »

This is my favorite forum on the Internet. I vote that we leave it as-is...
Project: OZone
Source: GitHub
Current Task: LIB/OBJ file support
"The more they overthink the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain." - Montgomery Scott
User avatar
osdever
Member
Member
Posts: 492
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 9:41 am
Contact:

Re: Upgrading Forum Software

Post by osdever »

SpyderTL wrote:This is my favorite forum on the Internet. I vote that we leave it as-is...
Same. I am against any kind of updates.
Developing U365.
Source:
only testing: http://gitlab.com/bps-projs/U365/tree/testing

OSDev newbies can copy any code from my repositories, just leave a notice that this code was written by U365 development team, not by you.
User avatar
Love4Boobies
Member
Member
Posts: 2111
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:36 pm
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Re: Upgrading Forum Software

Post by Love4Boobies »

Presumably, you like it not because of the infrastructure but because some of its members. Also, software engineering has evolved since the 60s; I don't think you need to worry about the bug count remaining constant throughout versions. Security fixes are always welcome, especially if you like this place. Otherwise, you may one day wake up with it gone. There are also a few broken things which some of you may have noticed (esp. on the wiki).

The biggest problem is that chase would have a lot of administrative work to do, as anyone who has done this sort of stuff well knows, and he's not payed for this time.
"Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons.", Popular Mechanics (1949)
[ Project UDI ]
User avatar
Schol-R-LEA
Member
Member
Posts: 1925
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:42 am
Location: Athens, GA, USA

Re: Upgrading Forum Software

Post by Schol-R-LEA »

Love4Boobies wrote:software engineering has evolved since the 60s; I don't think you need to worry about the bug count remaining constant throughout versions.
Yes, it has, but... Jevon's Paradox (and the related Parkinson's Law and Grosch's Law) applies, for the same reason it applies to CPU speed, memory size, size and speed of secondary storage, etc. - the need for more, and more complex, software exceeds the need for the software to run correctly, so improving software engineering is as likely to lead to more bugs (because it facilitates both less skilled programmers, on the one hand, and more ambitious projects, on the other) as it is to lead to fewer.

Hmmn, maybe we can ameliorate that somewhat if we could find a way to apply a modified version of Amdahl's Law to decisions regarding software improvements - if there were a simple heuristic to decide if a feature is worth the expense of developing and maintaining it, based on (for example) feature request frequency, the frequency in which users apply equivalent combinations of features to get the same result, etc., it might give software engineers some hints on how to prioritize which new features should be developed first. It would be a lot less objective than the Amdahl projections for hardware components, and getting people to use it (and not letting MGT override such decisions) would be an uphill battle, but it might be worth looking into (though I expect it has been tried before at least once).
Rev. First Speaker Schol-R-LEA;2 LCF ELF JAM POEE KoR KCO PPWMTF
Ordo OS Project
Lisp programmers tend to seem very odd to outsiders, just like anyone else who has had a religious experience they can't quite explain to others.
User avatar
dozniak
Member
Member
Posts: 723
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:29 am
Location: Tallinn, Estonia

Re: Upgrading Forum Software

Post by dozniak »

Love4Boobies wrote:Presumably, you like it not because of the infrastructure but because
..but because of Ponies theme!
Learn to read.
User avatar
Schol-R-LEA
Member
Member
Posts: 1925
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:42 am
Location: Athens, GA, USA

Re: Upgrading Forum Software

Post by Schol-R-LEA »

dozniak wrote:
Love4Boobies wrote:Presumably, you like it not because of the infrastructure but because
..but because of Ponies theme!
True dat.
Rev. First Speaker Schol-R-LEA;2 LCF ELF JAM POEE KoR KCO PPWMTF
Ordo OS Project
Lisp programmers tend to seem very odd to outsiders, just like anyone else who has had a religious experience they can't quite explain to others.
User avatar
matt11235
Member
Member
Posts: 286
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2016 1:52 pm
Location: East Riding of Yorkshire, UK

Re: Upgrading Forum Software

Post by matt11235 »

dozniak wrote:
Love4Boobies wrote:Presumably, you like it not because of the infrastructure but because
..but because of Ponies theme!
The real reason CompilerDev is ranked low on Google is because I haven't added the ponies theme :(
com.sun.java.swing.plaf.nimbus.InternalFrameInternalFrameTitlePaneInternalFrameTitlePaneMaximizeButtonWindowNotFocusedState
Compiler Development Forum
User avatar
dozniak
Member
Member
Posts: 723
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:29 am
Location: Tallinn, Estonia

Re: Upgrading Forum Software

Post by dozniak »

matt11235 wrote:
dozniak wrote:
Love4Boobies wrote:Presumably, you like it not because of the infrastructure but because
..but because of Ponies theme!
The real reason CompilerDev is ranked low on Google is because I haven't added the ponies theme :(
DO IT!
Learn to read.
Post Reply