OSDev.org

It appears the source code for Linux and FreeBSD both have the same bug in disabling BIOS ownership of the EHCI controller, which is kind of funny given some Linux experts here claiming it is the source-code base that "works".

In the EHCI document, the HCCPARAMS contains the EECP pointer at bits 8-15. In some EHCI-controllers, this capability cannot be found by scanning through the PCI capability-chain (because it is not linked into it). Therefore, the Linux source code checks every PCI location starting from 0x40 looking for the 0x1 signature. It thus find both the PME control capability, and the EECP base, and could try to do change ownership on the PME control capability (which could be disastrous).

Anyway, with this fixed, the RDOS EHCI driver know handles the port ownership correctly, and no longer takes a long time to change the config flag.

Rdos, you need to be reminded of the completely stupid statement you made about Linux EHCI Code.... http://forum.osdev.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=27316#p228844



Now you have made another claim:



If you want to claim Linux has a bug, you could at least have the decency to state the filename and the function where the bug supposedly is.
This may be news to you Rdos, but Linux is running successfully on millions of computers.
If your bug really is true, the bug would have been reported by someone and you should be able to point to a bug report somewhere.

Rdos, what file / function has the BIOS handover code for EHCI (and UHCI/OHCI) in Linux?

Congratulations on getting your operating system to work correctly.

I can't remember the exact file name, but it was the one that dealt with disabling BIOS ownership in the PCI address space. You should be able to find this piece of code yourself.

There are bug reports that probably are related to the issue: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1152163

Rdos, how many more stupid statements will you make?
The link you gave was for a specific motherboard, the Intel DG45ID.
And if you had of followed the links in the thread, you would have arrived at a message from Sarah Sharp, AN INTEL EMPLOYEE:
http://markmail.org/message/gitgu2q72qjxiwu3#query:+page:1+mid:ad5ymeymceinqfqb+state:results


So it was a bug with the BIOS, not Linux.
Also, if you had any brains, you would have noticed that bug and response was posted in 2008.
So I am 99.99% confident it has been fixed.
If you wish to buy an Intel DG45ID motherboard and test it, to prove me wrong, you are entitled to do that.

Rdos, you have now made 2 stupid statements about Linux. How long until you make a 3rd stupid statement?

Maybe if you looked at the current source-code base instead and made sure it didn't scan the PCI address space from 0x40 and up to discover the PCI location for BIOS handoff you could make sure the issue was fixed? What you do is try to claim the issue doesn't exist with idiotic arguments. It's possible I looked at old code that has been fixed, but I don't care since I'm not contributing code to Linux. They'll have to fix their own issues.

Rdos, you are the master of idiotic arguments. You started this thread with the following claim:

Rdos, I asked for Linux source file name / function name and you have failed to provide this.
Instead, you decided to provide irrelevent information - a link to a bug report for an Intel Motherboard BIOS.... from 2008.
Rdos, you are the person making idiotic arguments - you make big claims about Linux being faulty, with zero evidence to back it up.