OSDev.org

The Place to Start for Operating System Developers
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 12:45 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Table Re-Shuffle on Cross-Compiler Successful Builds
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 3:34 am 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:07 pm
Posts: 58
I've put a question up on the talk page for 'Cross-Compiler Successful Builds' titled 'Table re-shuffle' and figured it'd get a bit more attention or a faster response/input from the community if I linked to it from here in the forum. Please have a read, it's only 80 words, nothing long.

Cheers all for your input.

_________________
phillid - Newbie-ish operating system developer with a toy OS on the main burner


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Table Re-Shuffle on Cross-Compiler Successful Builds
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 6:20 am 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:23 am
Posts: 616
Location: Germany
If you feel like whatever changes improve the wiki, feel free to apply them. ;)
Yes, rearranging them makes sense.

_________________
Ghost OS - GitHub


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Table Re-Shuffle on Cross-Compiler Successful Builds
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 8:25 am 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:01 pm
Posts: 930
Sure. I'm not sure what the value of the article is, though. I don't see any no entries!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Table Re-Shuffle on Cross-Compiler Successful Builds
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 10:39 am 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 1:20 pm
Posts: 74
If you're still having trouble, I recently used gcc 4.9.2 and binutils 2.24 which works fine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Table Re-Shuffle on Cross-Compiler Successful Builds
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 4:48 pm 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:07 pm
Posts: 58
max wrote:
If you feel like whatever changes improve the wiki, feel free to apply them. ;)


Yeah, but I felt like this is a major change which might piss some people off, so I thought I'd give some form of heads up or test the water a bit.

max wrote:
Yes, rearranging them makes sense.


Good to hear support, I'll have to get around to rotating the tables sometime.

sortie wrote:
I'm not sure what the value of the article is, though. I don't see any no entries!


I suppose it's a good thing there are no 'no' entries. If someone encounters errors when compiling, they can check the article and confirm that it's not that other people have had success building a specific version combination so they can start tearing their hair out quicker ;) Maybe someday someone will encounter an incompatible version combination...

_________________
phillid - Newbie-ish operating system developer with a toy OS on the main burner


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Table Re-Shuffle on Cross-Compiler Successful Builds
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 6:11 pm 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:07 pm
Posts: 58
Okay, that didn't take as long as I expected. I've only rotated and combined the 4.x.x table, because the others have explanatory notes to comment on the GCC version or whatever. Anyone know who I go to in order to get some CSS stuck into the MediaWiki:Common.css for our wiki? It's nasty using repeated inline styles how I am now.

_________________
phillid - Newbie-ish operating system developer with a toy OS on the main burner


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group