kmtdk wrote:
call it an "inprovement" but just one where i did not had to spent like 1 day on cleaning up all, and move 5 tons of text, .....
Call it forcing a situation where you
have to move 5 tons of text and spend 1 day cleaning up since there are now two articles on the mouse where there should only be one.
Quote:
so insted of just "there is another page, inprove it insted" ..
I suppose searching first before creating a second page on the exact same subject wasn't an option... Also the point was "there already was another page, you should have improved that instead rather than creating a conflicting situation and make people angry."
Shifting the blame helps nobody, and will only lose you karma points. I suggest we all cool down and fix this situation.
Quote:
tell what i need now, cause then we can achive a better one . ( the reason why i ask you (all) to look at this, is because every one oversees something, and because you might make some "small" mistakes)
To be honest, your descriptions are incomplete to be able to make a proper implementation out of it. The existing mouse article lacks detail, but gives all the necessary basic detail to get something working. The details makes no sense when the basics have not been covered, so I would prefer the original article given the current state of both.
The best page would therefore be the one where both levels of information is present, and all the remaining holes have to be covered. To get there, the two pages will have to be merged.