OSDev.org :: View topic - Why is the 0x55AA signature unnecesary nowadays?

Often, you will see a boot signature (0xAA55) at the end. Older versions of BIOSes looked for this in order to identify a boot sector on a disk. It is evidently unnecessary nowadays.

I am following the babystep tutorial http://wiki.osdev.org/Babystep1 but somewhere says:

Quote:

Often, you will see a boot signature (0xAA55) at the end. Older versions of BIOSes looked for this in order to identify a boot sector on a disk. It is evidently unnecessary nowadays.

How does BIOSes identify a bootsector on a disk nowadays?

The BIOS uses various criteria to verify that it is a legitimate boot sector before executing it.

Author:	4dr14n31t0r [ Sun Nov 05, 2017 2:15 pm ]
Post subject:	Why is the 0x55AA signature unnecesary nowadays?
I am following the babystep tutorial http://wiki.osdev.org/Babystep1 but somewhere says: Quote: Often, you will see a boot signature (0xAA55) at the end. Older versions of BIOSes looked for this in order to identify a boot sector on a disk. It is evidently unnecessary nowadays. How does BIOSes identify a bootsector on a disk nowadays?

Author:	mikegonta [ Sun Nov 05, 2017 3:59 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Why is the 0x55AA signature unnecesary nowadays?
4dr14n31t0r wrote: I am following the babystep tutorial http://wiki.osdev.org/Babystep1 but somewhere says: Quote: Often, you will see a boot signature (0xAA55) at the end. Older versions of BIOSes looked for this in order to identify a boot sector on a disk. It is evidently unnecessary nowadays. Unnecessary for emulators like QEMU. 4dr14n31t0r wrote: How does BIOSes identify a bootsector on a disk nowadays? The boot sector is always the first 512 bytes of the first sector of the media. The BIOS uses various criteria to verify that it is a legitimate boot sector before executing it.

Author:	4dr14n31t0r [ Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:03 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Why is the 0x55AA signature unnecesary nowadays?
mikegonta wrote: The BIOS uses various criteria to verify that it is a legitimate boot sector before executing it. But what are the criterias of BIOS? Where can I find more information about that?

Author:	~ [ Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:57 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Why is the 0x55AA signature unnecesary nowadays?
You can download the 3-volume BIOS manual by Phoenix. It can be considered a full programming reference for 16 and 32-bit BIOS from standard PCs of the 90's which largely reaches modern BIOSes at the basic services, but not newer ones: http://archive.org/details/Phoenix_PC_BIOS_Books Listen the first volume: http://www.youtube.com/edit?o=U&video_id=gdUipEt4WPk You can carefully study the BIOS code from Bochs to see how it does things. You can see the 286 BIOS code from here: http://www.intel-assembler.it/portale/5 ... e-code.asp You can look at Ralf Brown BIOS Interrupt List: http://www.ctyme.com/rbrown.htm You will need to study the code from different OS development tutorials, the code from VisOpSys, MenuetOS, Linux, ReactOS, etc. Study boot methods from floppy, hard disk partitions, CDs/DVDs, network. That should clear out the topic of detecting valid boot media: http://devel.archefire.org/mirrors/ Information about many newer BIOS services, specifically INT 15h EAX=E801h/E820h: https://www.google.com/search?q=bios+e801+specification http://wiki.osdev.org/Detecting_Memory_(x86) http://www.esapcsolutions.com/ecom/draw ... serMan.pdf http://download.intel.com/support/mothe ... onv10a.pdf http://www.scs.stanford.edu/05au-cs240c ... bbs101.pdf http://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files ... _3.0.0.pdf http://uefi.org/sites/default/files/res ... ACPI_1.pdf http://www.rmprepusb.com/tutorials/biostestmem Inspect your existing disks with the specification documents, and try to reconstruct the overall booting sequence, maybe in an x86 emulator.

Author:	Solar [ Thu Nov 09, 2017 3:06 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why is the 0x55AA signature unnecesary nowadays?
~ wrote: Listen the first volume: http://www.youtube.com/edit?o=U&video_id=gdUipEt4WPk Oh FFS.... really? I mean, friggin' REALLY? First off, the link you provided doesn't even work. Second, and I thought we had been through this before -- a technical reference of several hundred pages, funneled through a speech processor and read to you by an artificial voice over the course of close to ten hours? That is worse than useless. This is sorry twits desperate to generate some content and traffic for their YT channel. What's next, the Yellow Pages of New Hampshire?

OSDev.org https://forum.osdev.org/

Why is the 0x55AA signature unnecesary nowadays? https://forum.osdev.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=32543	Page 1 of 1

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/