I'm having this weird issue where some of the stack is being overwritten by a function call.
Specifically, I have an IRQ handler in assembly that calls a general c irq_handler(), which calls the specific handler, in this case the one for the PIT timer. The assembly IRQ handler saves the state to the stack, so it's important that the general irq_handler() and the timer handler do not disrupt it. The problem seems to be that in the timer handler, the assembled code does not respect things that have previously been pushed to the stack. Here's the disassembled version and the c code from gdb:
P.S. I know it's a little weird to have the printf with an argument that doesn't get used, that was just a test, it has the same behavior when it just takes a single string.
Code:
│9 void timer_handler(regs_t r) { │
│10 timer_ticks++; │
│11 │
│12 //printf("tick\n"); │
│13 //switch_task(); │
│14 //printf("tock\n"); │
│15 │
│16 if (timer_ticks % hz == 0) { │
B+>│17 printf("O",0); │
│18 } │
│19 }
Code:
│0xc01042d0 <timer_handler> mov 0xc010b904,%eax │
│0xc01042d5 <timer_handler+5> add $0x1,%eax │
│0xc01042d8 <timer_handler+8> cltd │
│0xc01042d9 <timer_handler+9> mov %eax,0xc010b904 │
│0xc01042de <timer_handler+14> idivl 0xc01081a0 │
│0xc01042e4 <timer_handler+20> test %edx,%edx │
│0xc01042e6 <timer_handler+22> je 0xc01042f0 <timer_handler+32> │
│0xc01042e8 <timer_handler+24> repz ret │
│0xc01042ea <timer_handler+26> lea 0x0(%esi),%esi │
B+>│0xc01042f0 <timer_handler+32> movl $0x0,0x8(%esp) │
│0xc01042f8 <timer_handler+40> movl $0xc010869f,0x4(%esp) │
│0xc0104300 <timer_handler+48> jmp 0xc0106920 <printf> │
│0xc0104305 lea 0x0(%esi,%eiz,1),%esi │
│0xc0104309 lea 0x0(%edi,%eiz,1),%edi
I think the issue is at instruction 0xc01042f8 and 0xc01042f0. The assembly uses space in the stack for the arguments to printf, but it never allocates space for them at the beginning of the function. Could someone with more experience with assembly give any insight as to what might be the problem? I use printf a lot, and this has never been an issue before. To me it seems like the assembly is almost missing an instruction to sub from esp.
Any insight is appreciated. If any other code would be helpful, like my assembly IRQ handler, I can post that as well.
Thanks,
Zack
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
